on 02/02/2009 14:17 Rui Paulo said the following: > > On 2 Feb 2009, at 12:01, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > >> I may be wrong but this could auto-magically improve some cases where >> there are shared interrupts between drivers with ithreads. In this case, >> I think, their interrupt handler would be run "in parallel" instead of >> sequentially. > > I haven't read the details of the implementation yet, but how does that > work?
As I understand, in non-INTR_FILTER case there is one ithread per interrupt vector ("IRQ"), in INTR_FILTER case there is an ithread per handler ("driver"). This is a little bit simplified. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"