Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:36:15PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Just a question: Is the output from "ipfw list" supposed > > to be in the same rule format that is accepted as input? > > it is not, partly due to backward compatibility.
I see. > If you try "ipfw -c show" then you might have better luck though. Unfortunately that makes things even worse. The "dst-ip" word is still there, and additionally any rules containing "from any to any" are shortened, which is also not accepted as input to ipfw(8). What do you think about adding a new option that lists the rules in a format that can be fed back as input to ipfw(8)? There are several tools with similar options, for example "stty -g". So far -g is not used in ipfw(8), so ... Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd I suggested holding a "Python Object Oriented Programming Seminar", but the acronym was unpopular. -- Joseph Strout _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
