At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:57pm -0600, Jim Hall wrote: > I believe (and I think Aitor and Bernd agree, since they suggested it) > that UDMA is useful enough to modern DOS users that it belongs in > 'base', even though no such functionality existed in MS-DOS. > > I believe this is consistent with how Microsoft approached DOS. As new > technologies became available, Microsoft added a support utility to > MS-DOS. For example: POWER to support APM, EMM386/HIMEM to support more > than 640k, ... > > But if freedos-devel disagrees that UDMA belongs in 'base', I'll move it > back to 'util'. What's the rest of the list say? Where does it belong?
Base. -uso. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
