Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: UDMA as base?

[Jim Hall]

Okay, we can stop the discussion now.  I've gotten *lots* of email 
asking to keep UDMA in 'base', and none yet to say it should be in 'util'.

Consider UDMA a new resident of 'base'.  :-)

-jh



Erwin Veermans wrote:
But if freedos-devel disagrees that UDMA belongs in 'base', I'll
move it back to 'util'.  What's the rest of the list say?  Where
does it belong?


Base !

From time to time I get end-users of NwDsk complaining that
UMBPCI "does not work", where I explicitly have options in
my Config.sys-menu to load with/without UMBPCI and 
with/without UDMA (defaulting to: with UMBPCI, with UDMA).
I am still waiting for the first complaint of an end-user that
NwDsk "does not work" because of UDMA.

I consider UDMA as very few bytes very well spent and an
enrichement to FreeDOS.
Thanks Jack & Lucho for this fine piec of work.

Erwin


--
_____________________________________________________________________________
This email message has been automatically encrypted using ROT-26.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel