Hey Florian, I have an experimental branch called ipmimonitoring-discrete-reading on github here:
https://github.com/chu11/freeipmi-mirror/tree/ipmimonitoring-discrete-r eading ./autogen.sh ./configure make make install re-compile ipmimonitoring-sensors.c and try it out LMK if you need help, like getting to the right branch. If you can't make install, LMK and I can show you some linker tricks. Al On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 20:34 +0100, Florian wrote: > Hey Al, > > That's awesome! > > Sure, I'm totally OK with a git repo. As long as I just need to do > configure and make I can do it. > > Thanks for looking into this so fast! > > Florian > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 8:26 PM Albert Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> wrote: > > Hey Florian, > > > > Ok, I think I found a bug. The "discrete reading" flag is passed > > to an > > underlying library correctly, but the result is not stored in > > libipmimonitoring correctly. I don't remember how this workaround > > works 100%, because I never had this motherboard. > > > > Once I look into this, how would like to be able to test? Will > > pointing you to a github repo be ok? > > > > For my personal notes for later: see > > _digital_sensor_reading() and _specific_sensor_reading(), store > > sensor > > reading result and possibly units and other things too. > > > > Al > > > > On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 10:59 +0100, Florian wrote: > > > Hey Albert, > > > > > > The changeing of record_ids and record_ids_length showed the > > sensor 5 > > > (but no data) like this > > > Record ID, Sensor Name, Sensor Number, Sensor Type, Sensor State, > > > Sensor Reading, Sensor Units, Sensor Event/Reading Type Code, > > Sensor > > > Event Bitmask, Sensor Event String > > > 5, Power Meter, 5, Current, N/A, N/A, N/A, 9h, 2h, 'Device > > Enabled'. > > > > > > IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG unfortunately did not add ANY more > > logs > > > at all, so I tried with IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG_IPMI_PACKETS > > > which gave me more logs. > > > Those are quite a lot of more lines, so I pasted it into my > > > privatebin: https://privatebin.florianstroeger.com/?58387298f9b91 > > 3c4# > > > CkDCOMP5eFXOs6Whn+giWtidWNhMZGrkhc3tXYPaK9o= > > > I also tried setting discrete_reading to 1 as the sensor 5 was > > > visible with record_ids, but that did output the same results. > > > > > > Florian > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:07 AM Albert Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> > > wrote: > > > > Hey Florian, > > > > > > > > Lets try: > > > > > > > > unsigned int record_ids[] = {5, > > > > > > 0}; > > > > > > > > unsigned int record_ids_length = 1; > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > unsigned int ipmimonitoring_init_flags = > > > > IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG; > > > > > > > > Al > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 20:16 +0100, Florian wrote: > > > > > Oops, I'm sorry, Android-Mail apparently deleted the CC... > > > > > > > > > > I compiled with ipmimonitoring_init_flags = 1 now and got > > debug > > > > stuff > > > > > this time. > > > > > > > > > > The output is following... > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, > > > > > ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0xC0' > > not > > > > > supported > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, > > > > 752): > > > > > event_reading_type_code '0x70' bitmask is OEM > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, > > > > 752): > > > > > event_reading_type_code '0x71' bitmask is OEM > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, > > > > 752): > > > > > event_reading_type_code '0x71' bitmask is OEM > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, > > > > > ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0x8' > > not > > > > > supported > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, > > > > > ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0x8' > > not > > > > > supported > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > > > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, > > > > 571): > > > > > cannot read sensor for record id '23' > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > > > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, > > > > 571): > > > > > cannot read sensor for record id '24' > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > > > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, > > > > 571): > > > > > cannot read sensor for record id '38' > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > > > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, > > > > 571): > > > > > cannot read sensor for record id '39' > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > > > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, > > > > 571): > > > > > cannot read sensor for record id '40' > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > > > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > > > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, > > > > 571): > > > > > cannot read sensor for record id '41' > > > > > Record ID, Sensor Name, Sensor Number, Sensor Type, Sensor > > State, > > > > > Sensor Reading, Sensor Units, Sensor Event/Reading Type Code, > > > > Sensor > > > > > Event Bitmask, Sensor Event String > > > > > ipmi_monitoring_sensor_read_sensor_bitmask_strings: success > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm unfortunately don't know much about C. You mean I should > > > > change > > > > > in 'unsigned int record_ids[] = {0};' the 0 to a sensor-id, > > > > right? > > > > > Because I did this and that neither worked with putting 5 in > > for > > > > the > > > > > power meter nor with any other sensor. > > > > > > > > > > Florian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:47 PM Albert Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> > > wrote: > > > > > > Didn't see your output, I guess you forgot to paste it in. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmmm. That means the main monitoring code is just > > returning > > > > "0", > > > > > > i.e. > > > > > > 0 sensors read. Could you try experimenting with the > > settings > > > > and > > > > > > setting "record_ids" to the record we're trying to figure > > out > > > > (i > > > > > > think > > > > > > it was #5 in your prior post). Lets just concentrate on > > that > > > > > > specific > > > > > > record and try to figure out what's going on. Also set > > > > > > ipmimonitoring_init_flags for more debugging and lets see > > what > > > > gets > > > > > > output. > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, could you please respond to the mailing list. > > > > > > > > > > > > Al > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 07:50 +0100, Florian Ströger wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Albert, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the fast reply! > > > > > > > I've set 'int ignore_non_interpretable_sensors' to 0, but > > > > when I > > > > > > run > > > > > > > the binary now it just outputs the headers, like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Albert Chu > > > > > > ch...@llnl.gov > > > > > > Computer Scientist > > > > > > High Performance Systems Division > > > > > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Albert Chu > > > > ch...@llnl.gov > > > > Computer Scientist > > > > High Performance Systems Division > > > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Albert Chu > > ch...@llnl.gov > > Computer Scientist > > High Performance Systems Division > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
