On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:26:09AM -0600, Chris Parker wrote: > At 10:23 AM 12/29/2003, Mike Horwath wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:19:56AM -0600, Chris Parker wrote: > >> Dynamic linking on OS X is problematic. Rebuild/rerun configure with > >> --disable-shared. > > > >I have never heard of such a thing with 10.3... > > > >Care to pass out some pointers to your conclusions? > > Experience with it perhaps? > > Are you trolling or are you trying to postulate that dynamic linking > on 10.3 is just fine?
I am no troll. Just because you haven't seen me post here doesn't mean I have not been reading messages in this list for years, or running an ISP for more than 10 years. I ask that question because I have been doing development using different software under OS X now for over a year without a single problem I could attribute to dynamic linking and shared libraries. I have rebuilt 95% of my software under 10.3 without hassle or problem including my own hacked up news server (based on Diablo) that is going to go into production (part of a side business I have). Of course, this is far more I/O and bandwidth intensive than any RADIUS server :) So, uhm, now that we have determined I am not a troll, are you going to give more than a passing answer of 'experience' and provide some details? I would love to test out these theories and see what can be done. -- Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home: 763-540-6815 1901 Sumter Ave N, Golden Valley, MN 55427 Opinions stated in this message, or any message posted by myself through my Geeks.ORG address, are mine and mine alone, period. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
