Alan DeKok wrote: > Linus van Geuns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>3.) Did I claim someone _has_ to fix it, because I don't 'like' it? > > > Pretty much, yes. And you then got upset when I said you could fix it.
Hm, AFAIR... ah, maybe I got upset by this one: -------8<-------------------------------------- >>>> _And_ maybe this mail inspires some of the developers to report the appropriate error message instead of "rlm_ldap: could not start TLS Connect error". >>> >>> You just volunteered to write the patch. >>> Please mail it to the list when it's ready. >> >> I'm sorry, but I am bound to another software project atm. > > That's terrible! > When can we expect a fix? > > Alan DeKok. -------8<-------------------------------------- >>4.) I think, the error message from freeradius does obviously contain no >>useful degub information. > > <laughs> Sure. Have you ever tried using a *commercial* server? > They have *no* useful debugging or error messages. Ah! There is no need to care about it, because others don't care about appropriate error messages. I think, that's all I need to know by now. Linus van Geuns.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
