I'm all up for that and I'll add my contribution to the wiki of the AP's I've encountered.
On 11/25/06, David Mitton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/23/2006 02:09 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: >Manuel Sanchez Cuenca wrote: > > Alan DeKok escribió: > > >> Do you have a more specific question? > >> > > But not all APs enforce the Radius attributes. For example the Linksys > > wrt54g doesn't takes into account the session timeout attribute. So, can > > you tell me any AP which enforces this attribute, and others? > > If there was such a list, it would be up on freeradius.org, or on the >wiki. That is, you're asking on the FreeRADIUS list about NAS >documentation. > > I suggest picking an AP, and then reading its documentation to see if >it supports the attributes, or asking the NAS vendor. > > Alan DeKok. >-- The problem with compiling such a list is acquiring the equipment to test. Most of us just buy a couple APs and live with with we get. I discovered that the Linksys didn't honor Session-Timeouts when I captured it screwing up EAP-POTP sessions in progress, despite our RADIUS server providing Session-Timeout values in every EAP exchange. I think it's actually not properly implementing the 802.1x state machine in it's timeout behavior. And I didn't go looking for this. It was brought to my attention when someone else had a problem. The only AP that I know that works for everything I throw at it, during development, is the Cisco Aironet 1200 series. The only problem is that it's not cheap. But it works for me, so I don't try others. Dave. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
