Phil Mayers wrote: > Running redundant servers doesn't help much in this case for 2 reasons: > first, we've found that Cisco APs are very, very poor at detecting dead > radius servers and moving to the backup; second, it seems to be > malformed data coming from a certain client so if the APs do failover, > the 2nd server hangs up in short order.
That's not nice... > Additionally there are certain configurations that are easy to do > individually, but very difficult to combine; though the config unlang in > 2.0 should resolve most of the cases I have in mind Another thing for 2.0.0 (maybe) is to have per-socket configuration. i.e. socket X can have authorization section X, and socket Y can have authorization section Y. It may not be too hard to add, in fact. And it would be extremely useful. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html