Thank you. Actually the server is running very well now. Investigating more I realized that version 1.13 is still there but in different directories, so when I set to start on boot it will run version 1.13.
Does anybody know if it is only a matter of changing the radiusd script on /etc/init.d to point to version 2.1 daemon and conf files ? Or there is anything elese that I have to do ? Jair Santos > -----Original Message----- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > s.org > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > reeradius.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lum > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 12:04 PM > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > Subject: Re: Make error - Solved > > > I assume that you are referring to a build from source as > opposed to an > rpmbuild from source? > > If that's the case you would want to review this: > http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build#Building_RedHat_packages > > -Ted- > > Olavo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am posting this so it can save some headaches for other > people in > > the future. > > > > I've been trying to install FR on a 64 bits OS for a while. First I > > tried RH 5.2 and I got the following errors > > > > /usr/bin/libtool --mode=link gcc -o radmin > > > >>> radmin.lo /usr/lib/libreadline.so /usr/lib64/libtermcap.so > >>> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/freeradius-2.1.1/src/lib/libfreeradius- > >>> > >> radius.la > >> > >>> util.lo log.lo conffile.lo -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lreadline > >>> -ltermcap gcc -o .libs/radmin .libs/radmin.o > >>> > >> /usr/lib/libreadline.so > >> > >>> /usr/lib64/libtermcap.so .libs/util.o .libs/log.o > .libs/conffile.o > >>> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/freeradius-2.1.1/src/lib/.libs/libfreer > >>> > > adius-radi > > > >>> us.s > >>> o -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lreadline -ltermcap > >>> /usr/lib/libreadline.so: could not read symbols: File in > >>> > >> wrong format > >> > >>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > >>> gmake[4]: *** [radmin] Error 1 > >>> > > > > Then I move on to CentOs since Greg Woods informed that he > is using it > > without any grief. > > > > When I was making it on CentOS I got the exactly same errors above. > > Then I tried to install on Fedora 10 and it installed > smoothly. After > > playing with Fedora for some time I realized that it is too slow > > compared to CentOS or RH and I decided to move back to > CentOS and find > > a way to properly install it. > > > > The clue to fix the problem was provided by Greg when he > said that the > > FR included with CentOS was too old. When I installed the > first time I > > didn't realized that there is a FR 1.13 version on CentOS > so I didn't > > installed along with the OS. > > > > This time I selected 1.13 version and it was installed normally. > > > > Then I downloaded version FR 2.1 and it installed smoothly. Now I > > have > > > > radiusd -v > > radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.1, for host > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, > > built on Nov 28 2008 at 23:06:41 > > > > I read somewhere in the site that this is not the > recommended way to > > do it and that 2.1 should be installed in a different location. > > > > If someone could comment about any problems that can arise > it will be > > appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > > > Jair Santos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> s.org > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> reeradius.org] On Behalf Of Greg Woods > >> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:01 PM > >> To: FreeRadius users mailing list > >> Subject: RE: Make error > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:38 -0800, Olavo wrote: > >> > >>> Does anybody know about any Linux distro 64 bits that > >>> > >> Freeradius will > >> > >>> work for sure ? > >>> > >> I am using it on CentOS 5.2 x86_64. The freeradius package > >> that comes with CentOS 5 is old though, I compiled freeradius > >> from source. > >> > >> --Greg > >> > >> > >> - > >> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > >> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > >> > > > > > > - > > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html