Hi, >> Given that those boxes were last upgraded prior to 2000, I wonder how >> many people are really in the situation where they can't upgrade, and >> are likely to be using FreeRadius 2.2? >> >> It's not something I have much of an opinion on though - we binned them >> years ago! >> > It may be worth simply documenting the change for 2.2.0, and letting > people using broken NASes deal with the problem themselves. >
I just checked the main dictionary for the stable branch. It still $INCLUDEs dictionary.ascend.illegal. So people with broken NASes would still work by default, while standards-compliant folks need to deal with it by commenting out. Shouldn't it be the other way around? Greetings, Stefan Winter -- Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
