John Dennis wrote: > This then begs the question: What are the support plans for 2.x once 3.x > is released?
2.2.x will be marked "stable" and "long term support", just like 1.1.x. The 1.1.x releases will no longer be supported for *anything*. 2.0 was released 4 years ago. There is no reason for anyone to be running 1.x. > There is going to be a period of time where 2.x deployments will > continue to exist and folks will not want to experience the pain and > disruption of upgrading to the new 3.x version. What will happen when > problems are discovered in the last 2.x release? People can submit patches to fix them. Or, perhaps they can purchase a support contract to help fund continuing development. > Will they be fixed and > a new 2.x released in parallel with 3.x or will folks be told their only > option is to perform a 2.x to 3.x version upgrade? What happened with 1.x and 2.x? Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html