Hi Bruce, I'm sorry, I didn't phrase the question correctly. I do know why the orig.mgz comes out like that, however, I don't now why does the inflated surface in tksurfer look as if a chunk is missing out of it.
Thanks again, Panos > Hi Panos, > > you probably want to get a neuroradiologist to look at that scan. > > cheers > Bruce > On Tue, 30 > Jul 2013, pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I ran tksurfer (with the inflated surface option) on a couple of my >> subjects that had a major deformation in their orig.mgz file and the >> inflated surface of tksurfer looked as if a chunk was missing off of it >> at >> the position where the deformation is located. Is that normal? >> >> I have attached two images to illustrate what I mean: One of an axial >> slab >> of the orig.mgz file where the deformation is shown, and one of the >> inflated surface of the same subject in tksurfer. >> >> Thank you for your time, >> Panos >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
