On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 01:48, Michael Ruelle wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 17:08, Richard van Paasen wrote:
> > Consider this just a incentive to keep the database related code
> > separated from the freevo code so that e.g. mysql or postgresql can
> > replace sqlite. I've seen projects that incorporate sql statements
> > directly into the program code...
> 
> 
> Having gone through in my professional service the transition from one
> database to another I would advise against this. I was going to bring
> this up with dischi, but will state my piece here.

My last sentence was meant as an example of bad practise :-)




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to