On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 07:28:29AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:43:08PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > On 07 May 2002 22:22:13 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > > About bitmap I think it will be good to be able to define the bg and > > > the fg of the bitmap. The bitmap currently used the fg and bg color > > > and this gives unreadable text (if you do not use a tint). Any > > > objection for a bitmap_bg and a bitmap_fg options to the colorset > > > command? > > > > I have no real objection, but I would rather prefer to add support for > > symbolic color names in xpm pixmaps. I.e. support xpm, not limited xbm. > > The names that CDE supports would be a good start (bottomShadowColor is > > sh, topShadowColor is hi, I am not sure about names they use for fg and > > bg), and all colorset colors may be handled, not only the main four.
Now *that* would be a cool feature. I've been using FvwmCpp for years so I can have palettes (and font lists) with symbolic names. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
