On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:19:51PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 08 May 2002 10:21:35 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:43:08PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > I can see a need in additional colors per colorset. Say, something that > > > could be used in Vector buttons, currently only fg, bg, sh and hi allowed. > > > So, we may add sh_vector, hi_vector. > > > > I don't like the idea over overloading individual colour sets with > > lots of colours. Tim and I discussed that back then when he wrote > > FvwmTheme cand came up with the four colour structure we have now. > > Mikhael, what you are probably seeing a colour set as a kind of > > 'theme' whereas I see it as a colour pair with options. I agree > > that there may be a need for more complex theme like structures. > > But I'd rather see them as a layer on top of colour sets. > > I see a colorset as the only way to define colors inside a rectangle box. > I don't think that 4 main colors are enough for all needs. IMHO, it is > sometimes better to extend a colorset a bit if this solves a class of > problems than to use a new colorset just for one single color (other 3 > colors and background image are unused). > > There is no much need for sh_vector and hi_vector, they were examples. > Although they don't consume more than some bytes and have good defaults. > > But do you have anything against adding fg_shadow color (or fgsh)?
No, not at all. I've no problem as long as the colour in the colour set are usable regardless of the context (you could use a shadow colour anywhere where text is drawn). On the other hand, I wouldn't like to have - for example - icon specific colours in the colour set. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
