On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:33:32AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 12:48:28AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:19:51PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > On 08 May 2002 10:21:35 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > But do you have anything against adding fg_shadow color (or fgsh)? > > > > No, not at all. I've no problem as long as the colour in the > > colour set are usable regardless of the context (you could use a > > shadow colour anywhere where text is drawn). On the other hand, > > I wouldn't like to have - for example - icon specific colours in > > the colour set. > > > > So if I well understand you are opposed to colorset options as: > > - IconTint colour percent / IconAlpha percent > > which whenever a (mini-)icon is implied in the drawn rectangle > tint this (mini-)icon with "colour" at percent rate "percent" > (apply the mini-icon with an additional alpha of "percent", > respectively). > ...
But why make a special case if there is a mini icon? If we need a tint colour, shouldn't it be applicable to any forground, not just icons? I see no reason why, for example, text shouldn't benefit from tinting. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
