On 10 Jul 2002 16:08:33 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:46:22PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > On 09 Jul 2002 08:18:33 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > We already changed the colorset syntax by removing FvwmTheme. > > I suggest to use the word Image for the same reason that we once renamed > > PixmapPath to ImagePath, now fvwm even supports xbm and png, not just xpm. > > PixmapPath was *not* renamed to ImagePath. The reason for the new > name was to merge the two separate paths (IconPath and PixmapPath) > into a single one.
I know, a proposed PicturePath was renamed to ImagePath. > Pixmap is the name of the internal X picture object, not the name > of the image file format. Whatever the image is loaded from, X > still uses Pixmaps internally. I see no naming conflict here. This option requires a file (in one or another image format, that is searched in ImagePath) and should be named accourdingly IMHO. Strictly speaking an xbm bitmap is not pixmap, it requires 2 colors as parameters to be a pixmap. Png image is not strictly speaking a pixmap as well, it contains more information like alpha blending that is actually used in colorsets. These are my reasons to rename "Pixmap file" to "Image file" in colorsets. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
