On 19 Mar 2003 07:49:26 +0100, Uwe Pross wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, David Hansen wrote: > > > > This makes it nearly impossible to describe the page as > > > I did it and have them displayed properly in those > > > browsers. > > > > Why not just a link to a "light version" at the top of > > the page? > > I made a new version which uses background pictures only to > draw the decorations. Those pictures are not drawn by amaya > and dillo so they not shown at all in these browsers. > Defining a backgound color as well the site is still > visible in amaya and dillo even if it does not look that > fancy as in the other browsers. > > I have also added a menu in fvwm style.
I see you work on it right now. I like how it looks in Netscape 3 (without image decorations, but I think it could be nicer than just gray). Please always specify bgcolor in <td>, it is currently not specified in the gradient part. And I think the global page background could be set using <body background>, this way it will look nicer on more browsers. > Can anybody write a list of fvwm features you would like to > be shown on the web site? Do you mean the current features.html? It may be updated, but it is ok. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
