On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > I like how it looks in Netscape 3 (without image > decorations, but I think it could be nicer than just > gray).
I am quite suprised that is still looks good in netscape3 even if I had some difficulties to get it diplayed properly by the first time I opened it with netscape3. The version which is currently online is about 30 minutes old. I have tried a new version of the script which extracts the sub-pitures from a window screenshot image. The background colors have to be adapted when we have find the right decoration/layout for the page. > Please always specify bgcolor in <td>, > it is currently not specified in the gradient part. Done for most cases ;-) > And I think the global page background could be set using > <body background>, this way it will look nicer on more > browsers. You are right. I used stylesheets only till now. The background image in the body tag has been added by now. > > Can anybody write a list of fvwm features you would like to > > be shown on the web site? > > Do you mean the current features.html? It may be updated, > but it is ok. Uups. I have overseen it all times. - My fault. I will use features.html of course. Thanks for the hints. Regards, Uwe -- Uwe Pross mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
