On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 09:29:45AM +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> On 29 Apr 2003 at 18:09:47 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> 
> > > BTW: The total size I have given was not correct. I have
> > >   forgotten the window decoration pictures. They come to
> > >   another 25 kByte.
> > 
> > Wow, 25kB?  Why are they so big?
> 
> 25k was what "du -sk" showed me. If there are many small
> files in the directories "du -sk" reports quite more space
> than the files are together needed.
> 
> Each of them is not that big:
> 
>  55 bottom.gif
>  58 bottom_left.gif
>  57 bottom_right.gif
> 108 button_1.gif
> 108 button_2.gif
>  89 button_3.gif
> 110 button_4.gif
>  73 button_5.gif
>  88 button_6.gif
>  76 deco_definitions.inc
>  57 left.gif
>  51 middle.gif
>  57 right.gif
>  73 title.gif
>  55 top.gif
>  57 top_left.gif
>  58 top_right.gif
>  71 transparent.gif
> 
> > At work (fastest possible connection, I work for an internet
> > provider), 75% of the time (2 to 2.5 seconds) is used to load and
> > display the icons in the pager.  Is there a big penalty for
> > loading 20 small files?
> 
> What do you mean by penalty in this context?

Performance penalty.  Slowing down the load time.

> The pager is implemented as a set of html-tables.  The many
> pictures need some time to load and some time is needed to
> render the table. I guess with your internet connection
> download times can be neglected. Say you have got 10Mbit/s
> connection (I guess you have much more) 200 kbyte take less
> than 0.2 s to load (neglecting the times needed for request,
> request delay, processing and response delay). Most time
> will be needed for rendering the site. You may check this by
> loading the site from a locally installed web server.

I can hardly believe that rendering 20 tiny images takes more than
1.5 seconds.  Okay, mozilla is slow, but not *this* slow(?)

> > >   Since they are loaded due style sheet
> > >   definition they should be loaded at last after the
> > >   background pic has been loaded.
> > 
> > By the way, it might be good to load the outline of the
> > pager earlier so that the layout does not suddenly change
> > later.
> 
> I don't get that. What does suddenly change on your layout?

The page is initially displayed with the "window" using all the
available page width.  When the pager frame is loaded, the window
shrinks to make room for the pager.  I don't see it with mozilla
1.2.1 here (fast connection), but with 1.0 on my ISDN line.

Bye

Dominik ^_^  ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to