On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:28:44PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:07:37PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > In this case, I've been agreeing with both sides. > > Dominik has some very good points. > > I don't agree about the Style code being a problem and therefore > > shouldn't be extended, but I do agree that we need to freeze > > features to create a stable release. > > I am not agree with this. I think the code is safe. I do not > "understand" Dominik arguments against the patch (second version). > We have always added feature during feature freeze. Note also that > you can add bugs when you fix a bug... Currently, the existence of > the patch allowed to fix a few bugs!
I do not remember adding any new feature in feature freeze without a very good reason why it has to be in the release. I see none here. Fvwm existed ten years without window specific styles. What is the reason why we can not live without the patch for some more months? > > Try to see the other persons viewpoint and then ask yourself, > > can I give in on this a little for the sake of the team. > > This is the only argument I see to do not apply the patch. > So now if the patch is not applied what I've to do with it? I have held back dozens of patches for the sake of the feature freeze and it's no fun for me either. I refuse to abondon my notion of software quality for the sake of making the developers happy. But of course I can't stop you from doing what I think is wrong. Take fvwm and have fun with it. I give up. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
