On 6/24/06, Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24 Jun 2006 16:35:21 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:08:43PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > I can't say I am very happy about this. Actually, I would not be happy
> > about any new feature added without discussion before 2.6.0. :)
>
> Hm, I don't see that happen in the foreseeable future. Nobody is
> doing anything in that direction.
But is this a reason to make this task harder?
Can we release a 2.6.0-rc1 and move on? Then while some would maintain
it until a real 2.6.0, some would be working on 2.7. For the
volunteers it's a matter of deciding to either help on perfecting
2.6.0 or on improving 2.7.0.
The way things are, the project either dies or someone forks it. It's
not going forward if we don't allow it to.
Can we do it?
Cheers,
Renato
