On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:31 +0300, Jussi Lahtinen wrote: > You did it wrong. > Gambas would interpret your keys this way: > "A1234567" > "B1234567" > "C1234567" > > Use reversed order, that way following keys are all same: > "12345678A" > "12345678B" > "12345678C" > > ---> "12345678" > > Jussi
It doesn't seem to matter to SB. IMPORT hash.bas h = hash::New() hash::SetValue(h,"1234567890A",1) hash::SetValue(h,"12345678901234567890B",2) hash::SetValue(h,"123456789012345678901234567890C",3) hash::Start(h) FOR x = 1 to 3 PRINT hash::ThisKey(h), " - " PRINT hash::ThisValue(h),"\n" hash::Next(h) NEXT x hash::Release(h) jrs@laptop:~/sb/test$ scriba testhash.sb 1234567890A - 1 12345678901234567890B - 2 123456789012345678901234567890C - 3 jrs@laptop:~/sb/test$ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
