https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64345

--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)

The following pattern seems to fix the test case.

===================================================================
--- gcc/config/sh/sh.md (revision 225987)
+++ gcc/config/sh/sh.md (working copy)
@@ -14220,6 +14220,31 @@
   [(set (reg:SI T_REG)
        (zero_extract:SI (match_dup 0) (const_int 1) (match_dup 1)))])

+(define_insn_and_split "*zero_extract_3"
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arith_reg_dest")
+       (and:SI (lshiftrt:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "arith_reg_operand")
+                            (match_operand 2 "const_int_operand"))
+               (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand")))
+   (clobber (reg:SI T_REG))]
+  "TARGET_SH1 && can_create_pseudo_p ()
+   && exact_log2 (INTVAL (operands[3])) >= 0"
+  "#"
+  "&& 1"
+  [(const_int 0)]
+{
+  int rshift = INTVAL (operands[2]);
+  int lshift = exact_log2 (INTVAL (operands[3]));
+
+  rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (SImode);
+  emit_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode,
+    gen_rtvec (2,
+      gen_rtx_SET (tmp,
+                  gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTRACT (SImode, operands[1], const1_rtx,
+                                        GEN_INT (rshift + lshift))),
+      gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, get_t_reg_rtx ()))));
+  emit_insn (gen_ashlsi3 (operands[0], tmp, GEN_INT (lshift)));
+})
+
 ;; -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ;; SH2A instructions for bitwise operations.
 ;; FIXME: Convert multiple instruction insns to insn_and_split.


However, in some cases it might indeed be better to emit a shift-and sequence,
especially if the shift value is 1,2,8,16.
For instance

  return (((vi >> 6) & 0x01) << 3);

results in

        mov     r4,r0
        tst     #64,r0
        mov     #-1,r0
        negc    r0,r0
        shll2   r0
        rts     
        add     r0,r0

which is better as:
        mov     r4,r0
        shll2   r0
        shlr    r0
        rts
        and     #8,r0

Even more so when the bit test constant doesn't fit into 8 bits:

  return (((vi >> 10) & 0x01) << 1);

        mov.w   .L2,r1
        mov     #-1,r0
        tst     r1,r4
        negc    r0,r0
        rts     
        add     r0,r0
        .align 1
.L2:
        .short  1024

better:
        mov     r4,r0
        shlr8   r0
        shlr    r0
        rts
        and     #2,r0

Generally, it seems better to use an shift-and sequence, unless the tst-negc
sequence can simplify the trailing shift for SH variants without dynamic
shifts.

Reply via email to