https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134
Hongtao Liu <liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |liuhongt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu <liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #2)
> This was introduced by commit 0fec3f62b9bfc03e5088a09036791c2ac84fe0c8. I
> wondered if there might have been a patch hunk to update the example that
> didn't make it into the final commit, but that appears not to be the case.
>
> I don't feel competent enough with x86 assembly language or inline asm to
> guess at how to modify the example myself, so unless we just want to delete
> the extra operands from the table I'll have to pass on fixing this issue.
I'll adjust the example.
