https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125049
--- Comment #3 from JingYao Zhang <220245569 at seu dot edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> Per PR 85434 it seems more secure to add stack_protect_combined_{set,test}
> as apparently LoongArch backend will CSE stack canary address with the
> normal stack_protect_{set,test} as well.
Yeah (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> Per PR 85434 it seems more secure to add stack_protect_combined_{set,test}
> as apparently LoongArch backend will CSE stack canary address with the
> normal stack_protect_{set,test} as well.
I agree, spilling also should be fixed.
