Hi Jakub,
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:21:22PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> The following patch fixes
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818
>>
>> The patch was successfully tested and bootstrapped on x86_64. The patch
>> has no test because it is hard to check the problem. I checked manually
>
> This changed fixed PR83252 which has a reasonably small testcase.
> I've further reduced it using creduce (with -O0 -W{,maybe-}uninitialized
> and/or -fsanitize=undefined checking, plus test that it succeeds with
> r255258 and fails with r255257). Can you please double check if the
> testcase represents the same issue you were working on or if your change
> merely made the bug latent again?
>
> 2017-12-04 Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
>
> PR target/83252
> * gcc.target/i386/i386.exp (check_effective_target_bmi2): Moved to ...
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_bmi2): ... here.
> Guard with
> i?86-*-* x86_64-*-*.
> * g++.dg/opt/pr83252.C: New test.
the new testcase FAILs on Solaris/x86 with /bin/as:
+FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr83252.C -std=gnu++11 execution test
+FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr83252.C -std=gnu++14 execution test
+FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr83252.C -std=gnu++98 execution test
ld.so.1: pr83252.exe: fatal: pr83252.exe: hardware capability (CA_SUNW_HW_2)
unsupported: 0x80 [ BMI2 ]
Inside gcc.target/i386, clearcap.exp takes care of that.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
