Hello, I've a hard time understanding which one should be the correct result by gdal_translate or GeoServer.
My system (Ubuntu 22.04) has: - GDAL 3.4.1 - Geoserver 2.22 running on Tomcat on port 9090 I have a small tiff file (link to download at the bottom of this thread) in EPSG:4326, then I wanted to have a small subset on Lat and Long axes from it by running: - gdal_translate -projwin 137.915315044103 -36.51629558851893 154.64770004642423 -40.081875882617666 test.tif gdal.tif - curl ' http://localhost:9090/geoserver/wcs?service=WCS&version=2.0.1&request=GetCoverage&format=image/tiff&coverageId=test_raster:output&subset=Lat(-40.081875882617666,-36.51629558851893)&subset=Long(137.915315044103,154.64770004642423)' -o geoserver.tiff - Then gdalinfo gdal.tif returns: Size is 17, 4 and gdalinfo geoserver.tif returns Size is 17, 3 - Also the geo bbox of gdal.tif and geoserver.tif are different. First file gives: Upper Left ( 136.9750000, -35.9750000) Second file gives: Upper Left ( 137.9750000, -36.9750000) More importantly, the pixels are shifted from gdal.tif at the top to geoserver.tif at the bottom which you can see from this image: https://imgur.com/a/L0vKvYk Here is the link to download test.tif, gdal.tif and geoserver.tif https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dawCy38FMwx4J7OQsky-gAHHOXsMuDcy/view?usp=sharing Please share your opinion which result (gdal.tif or geoserver.tif) should be correct? Thanks,
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev