On Sun, 1 May 2011 10:46:59 +1000 Lex Trotman <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe Compiled/Interpreted would have been Ok actually. But for now I > > decided to just revert to Programming/Scripting. > > Ok. > > I guess there isn't any real perfect solution to this, just to explain > I see Programming/Scripting as being more user oriented than > compiled/interpreted which is specific implementation oriented, and as > has been said there can be lots of implementations. Agree. > Not that everyone might agree with the current division, I'm sure the > folks at Ericsson who are programming telephone switches in Erlang > might see it as more than a scripting language :-) But programming is > too long already. I think the Scripting group could be thought of as a subset of Programming. That's not to suggest it be a submenu though ;-) Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel