On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:34:20 +0300 Dimitar Zhekov <dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:27:47 +0200 > Frank Lanitz <fr...@frank.uvena.de> wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200 > > Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > About plugins - I'd like to see them converted to git too but for > > > me it's much less important. Plugins are usually one-man-show and > > > require much less cooperation than Geany itself and their authors > > > already have SVN access. > > > > Due the huge number of contributors at the plugins project and the, > > well quiet often broken build, a more decentralized process would be > > good for the plugins. [...] it would be might useful to make more > > usage of branches and only merge to trunk, when its apply correct > > and build is not broken and some other points of policy is met > > Taking into account what Jiří said, perhaps the plugin developers > should try to follow the policy in the first place, before commiting > to svn? It's not like they are lacking hard disks and have to use a > branch for storage space. I agree, but they don't obviously. Just run a make check on geany-plugins :( Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpKto0IZAmLh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
