On Thursday 12 April 2007 09:37, Patrick Doyle wrote: > ok... no problem. The only reason I did it before was > because that was the way the spice-sdb backend to gnetlist > embedded simulation commands in the schematic. It probably > has to do with where the simulation command shows up in the > schematic file. > > Since I found that to be confusing when I first saw it, (not > being aware of how spice operated), and since it is not > likely to be the right thing for newbies to do I'll take a > look at spice-sdb and see if there is a way to sort the > output so that embedded simulation commands come out at the > end. (Hmmm.... now that I think about it, I seem to recall a > "sort things so that gnucap is happy" option that already > exists for spice-sdb.) Of course, since Stuart reads this > list, he'll probably jump in, change the single line of code > that needs to be changed, and issue a patch before I even > finish drinking my Diet Pepsi this morning. :-)
There is a switch, supposedly, "-s". I never use it because I don't put simulation commands in a schematic. Don't worry about it. There are big changes happening in gnucap, and in a month or two it won't matter. There are bigger issues than this one. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user