Hmmm, How about an unstable distribution where it is guaranteed that nothing will work? Cool, that is my standard practice.
Steve M. On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 17:52 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Fedora is meant for cutting edge :) where bug fixes are pushed. > > Fedora DEVELOPMENT is for cutting edge. Fedora UPDATES is for stable > stuff. Don't confuse the two, and please don't annoy our users by > "shipping" something that's potentially broken, not tested, and > certainly not supported. > > And if the geda maintainers say "don't package this", then don't > package it. Yes, we can't stop you, but we can ask you to respect our > wishes and advice. > > If you really must package up the unstable snapshots, please change > the spec file so that the rpm is named geda-unstable and the files are > installed in a /usr/local/geda-unstable/ subdirectory or something, so > that they don't interfere with the stable release RPMs. > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user