Finally got around to rebuilding from source, and it seems to have worked for me, too. At least, gschem comes up and appears normal, and survived 10 seconds of testing...
-dave Steven Ball wrote: > > First off, I followed your page at http://www.ghz.cc/charles/fink/ to > configure my system to use the 'unstable' branch, and then followed > instructions from these guys: http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ > item/14 to add in their binary package tree. I ran a fink > selfupdate, and then a fink install geda-bundle. > > This pulled in guile16 and the geda-bundle packages, which resulted > in the issue as described in earlier emails. > > I then removed all geda packages, removed guile16, and removed the > Todai Fink Team's tree from my apt sources. Next, I ran a fink > selfupdate, and then, a fink install geda-bundle, and it pulled in > guile16, the geda packages, and a bit of etc (I'm afraid I did not > note what else it pulled in), and then proceeded to compile them from > source. > > At the completion of the compile, I ran gschem again and it has been > trucking along just fine. > > Also, the source compile still depended on guile16. I just let it > pull it in and compile it. Perhaps guile16 is broken on my machine > via binary? > > Other notes, my old powerbook, which was working with binary packages > of a much older version, is a PPC, and this new machine is Intel. > Don't know if is any kind of issue. > > Let me know if you have further questions, I am more than happy to > give you whatever info that would help. > > Thank you for your work on all this, regardless, it has saved me a > lot of work in the past. > > -Steve > > > On Sep 28, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Sep 27, 2007, at 6:13 PM, Steven Ball wrote: >> >>> Built from source, no issues now. >>> >>> I guess there is an issue with the binary package, then. >> Can you elaborate a little on what changed when you built from source? >> >> Which versions of guile were installed? >> >> Since the binary packages work on my machine, I would like to >> figure out what has changed. >> >>> Thanks all for your help! >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Doty wrote: >>> >>>> Build from source is what worked for me. >>>> >>>> On Sep 27, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Steven Ball wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sep 27, 2007, at 1:26 PM, John Doty wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you tried installing guile18, and then reinstalling geda- >>>>>> bundle? >>>>>> I really suspect the Guile compatibility issues are biting you >>>>>> here. >>>>>> There are some hoops the installer needs to jump through >>>>>> depending on >>>>>> which version of Guile you have, and Fink handles this differently >>>>>> from other free software distros. And I'm having no problem with >>>>>> guile18. >> The idea behind having separate packages for guile16 and guile18 >> (and their corresponding -dev splitoffs) is that you can build >> against one, and it should build the same way every time. (This is >> why some of the GUILE_* environment variables are hard-coded in the >> Fink .info files.) >> >>>>> The binary packages built for OS X depend on guile16 being >>>>> installed. Maybe I should try building from source and see what >>>>> happens. >>>>> >>>>> -Steve >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> geda-user mailing list >>>>> geda-user@moria.seul.org >>>>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user >>>> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >>>> http://www.noqsi.com/ >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> geda-user mailing list >>>> geda-user@moria.seul.org >>>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user >> >> -- >> Charles Lepple >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user