Fair enough. Steve M.
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:57 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote: > Steve Meier wrote: > > This can also be turned around. What are the rquirements that you have > > for an eda tool set? > > > > I tend to list the weaknesses of geda/pcb from my perspective. > > > > 1) Lack of support for hierarchical buses. > > 2) pcb lacks buried, blind and micro vias. > > 3) no back annotation between pcb and gschem. > > #3 should read "limited back annotation between pcb and gschem". If you > renumber reference designators in pcb via the Renumber() action, the > capability to back annotate that to schematics exists today. But that > is it. Manual renumbers, new instances, value changes (0.1 uF -> 0.01 > uF), pin swap, gate swaps, etc are not supported for back annotation. > > -Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user