As long as its semantics is well enough deffined that I can write a macro to read and write its file formats then why not?
al davis wrote: > On Wednesday 05 December 2007, Michael Sokolov wrote: > >> al davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Why invent a new language? Either Verilog-AMS or VHDL-AMS, >>> the = structural subset, has everything you need. >>> >> I needed something I could implement by myself without any >> help from the outside world and without any dependencies. It >> also needs to run under UNIX Version 7 and cannot depend on >> anything other than a K&R C compiler plus standard UNIX stuff >> that came with V7 (such as M4 that everyone hates so much but >> which I absolutely adore). >> > > That is why I said "the structural subset". It meets all of > those requirements. In this case, Verilog is lighter than > VHDL. > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user