Peter TB Brett wrote: > Um... I think exactly the opposite. What you're suggesting would just make > the already-steep gschem learning curve even worse. I'm trying to find a way > to make it so that there is *one* unified part/symbol library that's > sufficiently powerful and flexible for people to do whatever arcane things > they like with it, while still being capable of being used in a simple way if > that's required. I honestly think this is achievable, and I hope you agree > with me that it's a worthwhile goal...
Keeping thing simple for new users is very important. Larry Wall said it best: "Simple things should be easy. Complicated things should be possible." -dave _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user