On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:52:32 -0500, "Ales Hvezda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > [snip] > > 1. The HTML descriptions of the things in the packages seem out > > of date, for example http://geda.seul.org/tools/utils/index.html > > doesn't mention tragesym, but does mention gmk_sym. > > Yup, please (or somebody) provide an updated page or patches. > > > > > 2. You don't seem to be able to download the packages from here. The > > link under 'Where can I download the utilities?' leads to the gEDA > > download page, the sources section of which points you back to the > > sources page. It seems circular. > > I don't understand this. On the sources page there is:
Well it worked for me today, perhaps I was insane, but I thought that before the sources link on the download page took you to http://geda.seul.org/tools/. > > It might be better to just do like GNU and dump all the available > > versioned > > packages in a directory and let people sort it out themselves. > > Really? Is that's better than an annotated download page like > sources.html? Its the no-documentation vs. wrong documentation question. Manually maintained lists like that have a strong tendency to fall out of sync. Britton _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user