>>> Well, OK, maybe some would, but they have been working on PCB for >>> so long they are benignly blind to the needs of the rest of us. >> I'm not blind to the need, just sorely lacking in time to do >> anything about it. [...] > Hey, I understand completely.
Me too. Saying that the internals doc is lacking is not criticizing _you_! It's better than most of my own code's internals doc - probably even most of the code I distribute. One of the things I intend to produce for my own use is a reference for the PCB<->HID interface - and that's one of the things I'll be happy to feed back for others' use. If desired, that is, which it sounds as though it is. > My comments were not meant as criticism, sorry if it came off that > way -- just trying to set expectations for the OP. Ah yes, expectation management. The customer-interface people at work talk a lot about managing customer expectations. (I work for an ISP.) I don't really _expect_ anything here. Even if nobody helps me at all, PCB will still save me a lot of time and effort as compared to what I was more than half expecting I'd have to do, and I thank everyone involved in making it so. A few bugs are inevitable - try to find anything anything like PCB's size that doesn't have bugs! - and if dragging my language-lawyer persona out of the closet will help eliminate some of them, I'm certainly up for it. See y'all over on geda-dev for the details. :) /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user