On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 17:28 +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 04:17:03PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > > > The config syntax wouldn't even be changing.. just a more formal > > specification that "don't expect this file to be _executed_ by the > > scheme interpreter. > Will plugins be able to change configuration variables so I could just a > plugin instead of a configuration script? > I'd really hate loosing the ability to programmatically generate my > configuration.
Yes, that was the intention. Please send an example of the programmatically generated config you're using. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user