> Is there any reason why this Win32 effort isn't / can't be merely > adding developer time to ensure that the GTK code works well for its > Win32 port, and adding native code as required to improve the > integration / feel of the app for Windows users?
Because, as Mike puts it, GTK under windows doesn't look like windows, doesn't act like windows, and just confuses users. > Aside from the exercise to verify the decoupling of the HID API, > (and at the risk of being controversial), what are the tangible > reasons for the Lesstif HID's continued existence? It looks different, acts different, etc. If it were me, I'd get rid of the GTK hid - it's the least maintainable for us. > Either GTK, QT, or WxWidgets would give us a single toolkit, single > code-base HID with true cross platform portability to Unix, Win32 > and MacOS. And it would look like and act like none of the above. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user