On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Peter Clifton <pc...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:33 -0400, evan foss wrote: >> I have been using this release and I have a question. Did you guys >> change the interpritation of gafrc? I keep loading a schematic and it >> doesn't seem to render the symbols in the project directory properly. > > Shouldn't have, but some scheme syntax for other things might have > changed. Depending on what else you have in there, it might be causing > problems. Anything unusual uin your log window, or gschem.log?
I am loading something I made back around version 1.4.0. > > gschem.log is no longer dumped in the current working directory. You > will find one in $HOME/.gEDA/logs/gschem-{date}-{seqno}.log Oh. I was kind of glazzing over the log. It was repeating a message about missing pin seq=. I had a number of symbols for components broken into parts. So my lm339 was lm339-1-pt1.sym, lm339-1-pt2.sym, lm339-1-pt3.sym, lm339-1-pt4.sym. I left them with identical pinseq attributes set. What is funny is that gschem 1.4.0.20080127 reads the file correctly even with the pinseq attributes wrong. Sorry, I have to get out of my bad habbit of clicking that log window off with out reading it. > > Regards, > > -- > Peter Clifton > > Electrical Engineering Division, > Engineering Department, > University of Cambridge, > 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, > Cambridge > CB3 0FA > > Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > -- http://www.coe.neu.edu/~efoss/ http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user