On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:00 PM, DJ Delorie <d...@delorie.com> wrote: > Except that PCB is an application, not a library. If swig assumes the > target is a library (I don't think it does), perhaps that means that > swig is a bad choice? Or perhaps you could change the way you're > trying to use it? As soon as we split out a library, we have to start > worrying about compatibility across releases, which is a pain. >
You're right, swig does not assume the target is a library, but the bindings would require all of the same object files that would be in a shared library. Which is why I'm suggesting a shared library. Jason _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user