DJ Delorie wrote: > So, can we ignore the "flexible" vs "easy" argument for now? I think > it's much more important to get the intermediate step first - giving > people an easier solution to *trying* gEDA to see if it fits their > needs. >
Honest, I didn't read this post before writing one of my own that says the exact same thing. I don't know whether that's a good sign, or not. Perhaps it's for the best that DJ doesn't know me at all, so he can't decide whether it's a good thing or not that we think alike about something. :) b.g. -- Bill Gatliff b...@billgatliff.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user