On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:17:02 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > It is a perfect example of why gEDA can never grow more "friendly" > interfaces to these problems. _Because_ the existing interface can be > abused - and people think it is a good idea to encourage such > "flexibility", we end up with designs out there relying on the > behaviour.
Let me get this straight: Is the combination of a (slotted) symbol with a seperate power symbol such an abuse that just works by accident? ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user