> My current methodology would have an infrastructure bubble on some > back sheet that connects up the power and ground pins for each > package. But now since package selection can be deferred, that > doesn't work so hot, unless we extend the idea of back-annotation to > include creation of schematic sheets. Which I'm OK with.
This whole scheme just screams for back-annotation, especially since you really want pcb to be able to do pin and gate swapping. > Actually.... this is starting to sound like embedding a gattrib grid > on a sheet some place. Can gattrib map pins to nets already? _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user