On Sep 11, 2010, at 1:28 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote: > Peter Clifton wrote: > >> Yes, indeed.. magic silk (and other) layers should probably go >> and die. > > Please do. My local list of warts and rooms for improvement contains > many complaints about things that can't be done with silk. Worst of > all: You can't selectively print top-silk and bottom-silk like the > regular layers.
That's because they are implemented as a class, rather than just a layer with certain properties. This sort of problem is an inevitable consequence of classification. But when I wrote: >> "Class" is a misleading term in this context. Nets (at best) have >> properties: classification is sloppy thinking. you insisted: > No, it is structured thinking. Certainly, inflicting structure in conflict with the natural structure of the problem space is sloppy thinking. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
