Yes, and you are still running lunix from 1999, right? I'm sorry but anyone complaining about .net in 2010 is just asking to be ridiculed.
On 19 Sep 2010 10:04, "John Griessen" <[1]j...@ecosensory.com> wrote: > On 09/19/2010 11:56 AM, John Griessen wrote: >> Is the .NET framework something you can add >> to old versions of windows? > > I found this on a forum archive. Not certain it's correct, but... > > "The Microsoft .Net Framework version 3.5 does not contain support for Windows 2000. It appears that Microsoft is dropping support > for that operating system as they release their new technologies. I already knew that version 3.0 did not include Windows 2000. I > had hoped it would be included in 3.5. They are supporting XP, Vista, and Windows 2003." > > So, by using .NET you put users of your compilation in an upgrade treadmill to the benefit of Microsoft. > > John > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [2]geda-u...@moria.seul.org > [3]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user References 1. mailto:j...@ecosensory.com 2. mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org 3. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
