> > I'm surprised we're still discussing this *at all*. > > You can't build a solid system on a shaky foundation. This is > precisely the kind of thing we need to get right, or it will > continue to cause unexpected artifacts to appear.
I think we got it right the first time we discussed it way back when. We're just rehashing old arguments, no new info is being added. I know what we're going to do, and we all seem to agree it's the right thing to do. Where is this "shaky foundation" you're accusing us of? _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user