On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Peter Clifton <pc...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 11:26 +1100, Stephen Ecob wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> Here's my patch that should be equivalent to your patches 0001 >> followed by 0002. >> My patch is against GIT head as at commit >> 466b0183758ef3ca44623c43de60a233b175d2ad Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:43:19 >> +0000 (13:43 +0000) >> I suggest you check that our patches are equivalent, hopefully that >> will ensure that no mistakes slip through. > > It caught a few things I'd changed where I shouldn't have, and although > we didn't end up with completely identical changes, I've fixed up my > patches and pushed them. > > Speaking of which.. I really meant to get your name on the commit log, > and I did not. VERY sorry about that, especially after all the help > you've given me with testing things. > > AH HECK.. I'm going to break a rule and non-fast-forward push them again > with the appropriate credit.
Oh, thanks - you didn't have to do that! Anyway, the main thing is it's nice to see all of the tidying up that you've pushed today :-) Best regards, Stephen _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user